13 October: date and substance, not workshop codes

What we did

We created a scan for outgoing drafts and attachments. It looks for internal codes, names and other workshop traces the recipient does not need.

The scan can stop the process before a draft is ready. That gives a working rule a concrete check without claiming it covers every aspect of confidentiality.

What the second look found

The source records automated tests and rejection when a match is found. It does not include a separate second reviewer’s assessment for this day.

What a person approved

The rule and scan were recorded on 13 October. This source does not demonstrate a separate digital signature.

The rule that stayed

A recipient gets the date and the substance. An internal work code does not help them understand what is finished.

Still open

The scan recognises defined patterns. A person still needs to judge whether the text and attachments truly belong with this recipient.

• How this was made
• CC BY 4.0